Skip to content
← All Guides

Guide

Financing Land
Without Planning Permission

Most lenders won't touch it. Here's who will, what it costs, and how to structure the deal to get approved.

7 min read | Land & Planning

Why Banks Say No to Land Without Planning

From a traditional lender's perspective, land without planning permission is one of the riskiest assets they can lend against. There's no income, no proven development value, and the biggest variable — whether planning will be granted — is entirely outside everyone's control. A field with no planning consent might be worth £30,000 per acre. The same field with residential planning could be worth £500,000+ per acre. That kind of value swing makes credit committees nervous.

High street banks won't entertain it. Even specialist buy-to-let lenders, who are comfortable with investment property, draw the line at bare land. The asset can't generate rental income, can't be insured in the same way as a building, and if the borrower defaults, the bank is left holding a plot they can't easily sell at the price they lent against.

This doesn't mean the deal is unfundable. It means you need a lender who understands land, planning risk, and the development lifecycle — and who prices their lending accordingly.

Who Will Lend on Land Without Planning

The lender pool narrows significantly for land without planning consent, but it's far from empty. Our panel includes lenders who actively seek out these deals:

Specialist bridging lenders

A handful of established bridging lenders have dedicated land and planning teams. They understand the planning system, can assess the likelihood of consent, and will lend on current use value with an uplift for planning potential.

Private funds and family offices

UHNW individuals and private credit funds are often the most flexible lenders for land deals. They can make subjective decisions about planning prospects that institutional lenders can't. Terms are bespoke — every deal is individually underwritten.

International capital

Some overseas lenders and funds view UK land — particularly in areas with housing demand — as an attractive risk-adjusted play. They tend to want larger deals (£1m+) and strong borrower track record.

Joint venture partners

For the right site, some lenders will structure a JV arrangement — providing the purchase finance in exchange for a share of the planning uplift. This can work when your own capital is limited but the site has strong potential.

What LTV to Expect

This is where expectations need managing. When a lender says they'll offer 65% LTV on land without planning, they mean 65% of the current market value — not the value you hope it will be worth with planning permission.

Here's the reality:

Agricultural land (no planning)

50% - 60% LTV

Brownfield / urban land

55% - 65% LTV

Land with pre-app or outline consent

60% - 70% LTV

If you're buying a 2-acre site for £200,000 and the valuer confirms that figure as market value, expect a maximum loan of £100,000 - £130,000. The rest comes from you. Lenders want meaningful borrower equity in land deals because if planning is refused, the exit strategy becomes significantly harder.

How the Valuation Works: Current Use vs Hope Value

The valuer's report is the most critical document in a land deal. They'll provide two figures that matter:

Current use value is what the land is worth today, for its current purpose, with no assumption that planning will be granted. For agricultural land, this might be £8,000-£15,000 per acre. For a derelict commercial site, it's whatever the cleared site would sell for on the open market.

Hope value reflects the premium the market pays based on the reasonable expectation that planning permission could be obtained. A greenfield site adjacent to existing housing, in a local authority with a housing shortfall, carries meaningful hope value — potentially 2-5x the agricultural value — even without a planning application submitted.

Most lenders will lend against current use value only. A few will factor in a proportion of hope value, but don't rely on this. Structure your deal assuming the most conservative valuation.

Planning Risk: How Lenders Assess It

Lenders are not planning consultants, but the good ones will assess planning risk pragmatically. They're looking for signals that consent is achievable:

Local plan allocation: Is the site within or adjacent to a settlement boundary? Is the local authority meeting its five-year housing land supply? Sites in areas with a demonstrable shortfall have a stronger case at appeal.

Pre-application feedback: A positive pre-app response from the planning authority significantly de-risks the deal. Some lenders won't proceed without one.

Adjacent development: If the land sits next to recent housing development, the planning precedent is strong. Lenders take comfort from this — it's harder for a council to refuse consent when they've approved the neighbouring site.

Constraints: Green Belt, AONB, flood zone, listed buildings, TPOs, contamination — these all increase planning risk and reduce the lender pool. Green Belt land is particularly difficult to finance speculatively.

Structuring the Deal

The most common structure for land without planning is a bridging loan to acquire the site, with a 12-18 month term that gives you time to secure planning consent. Your exit strategy is usually one of three routes:

Option 1: Sell with planning consent. Buy the land at agricultural or current use value, secure planning, sell the consented site to a developer. The planning uplift is your profit. This works well for smaller sites where you don't want to take on the construction risk.

Option 2: Refinance into development finance. Once planning is granted, the site value increases dramatically. You refinance the land loan into a development finance facility that covers the build costs, repaying the bridging loan in the process.

Option 3: Retain and hold. In some cases, the planning consent itself is the asset. You may choose to hold the site and sell later, or enter a conditional contract with a housebuilder.

Budget for the planning process itself — architect fees, planning consultant, surveys (ecology, highways, drainage, arboriculture), application fees, and potentially S106/CIL contributions. On a residential scheme these can easily total £30,000-£80,000 depending on scale. Some lenders will roll these costs into the facility.

Real Numbers: What Land Finance Costs

Monthly interest rate

0.85% - 1.25% (rolled up)

Arrangement fee

1.5% - 2.5% of the loan

Typical LTV

50% - 65% of current use value

Term

12 - 18 months

Rates are higher than standard bridging because of the planning risk. On a £150,000 land loan at 0.95% over 12 months, your total interest cost is approximately £17,100 — rolled up with no monthly payments. Use our bridging calculator to model your specific scenario.

The economics work when the planning uplift justifies the cost. If you're buying land at £200,000 and a planning consent makes it worth £800,000, the £20,000-£30,000 in finance costs is a small fraction of the value created. Talk to us about your land deal — we'll tell you honestly whether it's financeable and what it'll cost.

Related Finance

Ready to Discuss Your Deal?

No obligation. We'll tell you what's possible and what it'll cost. If we can respond immediately we will, otherwise within 2 hours during business hours.

0330 223 7872 Quick Enquiry